UnionEyes starts with an assessment, then moves into deeper review and rollout support if needed. Most organizations begin by understanding their risks before discussing any software rollout.
Terms used on this page
Every UnionEyes relationship begins with an assessment. The first three steps are clear and priced so a leader can start the conversation without waiting for a long sales process.
Pseudonymous · no login required
A scoped organizational continuity assessment that surfaces fragility, signals, and burden — without commitment. The ICRA entry point.
One-time · delivered as a governance-readable document
A deeper organizational reading of the same assessment — governance entropy, continuity debt, dependency review, and modernization risk surfaced for executive and board conversation.
Facilitated engagement · executive workshop included · 100% credited toward any subsequent engagement if signed within 90 days
A full diagnostic engagement: facilitated review, organizational continuity workshop, memory lineage mapping, and an executive briefing note your board can act on. The full fee credits forward toward a subsequent Assessment, Topology, or Platform Engagement if you proceed within 90 days.
Most organizations start with the free check and only move further when the risks uncovered justify it.
When an assessment shows bigger continuity risks, organizations can move into deeper support. These are service options, not seat-based software packages.
Organizational diagnostics
Diagnostic. Discreet. Strategic.
Best for: Federations and organizations establishing a continuity baseline before any tooling decision.
$18,000–$45,000 CAD · one-time engagement
A starting range. Final scope is shaped jointly with you and your procurement leadership — no self-serve checkout, ever.
Structural risk deepening
Structural. Interpretive. Forward-looking.
Best for: Organizations that have a baseline and need structural depth: dependency analysis, modernization pathways, confidence-aware interpretation.
$35,000–$90,000 CAD · one-time engagement
A starting range. Final scope is shaped jointly with you and your procurement leadership — no self-serve checkout, ever.
Continuity infrastructure (post-diagnostic)
Operational. Governance-safe. Inherited.
Best for: Organizations ready to activate continuity infrastructure on top of an assessed baseline — not generic SaaS onboarding. Requires a completed Assessment Engagement (or Full Diagnostic) first.
$40,000–$140,000 CAD per year · annual subscription (post-diagnostic)
A starting range. Final scope is shaped jointly with you and your procurement leadership — no self-serve checkout, ever.
Continuity stewardship
Durable. Inherited. Federation-grade.
Best for: National unions and federations sustaining continuity across leadership cycles, mandates, and federation-wide coordination.
Multi-year stewardship · scoped with executive leadership
A starting range. Final scope is shaped jointly with you and your procurement leadership — no self-serve checkout, ever.
Strategic organizational collaboration
Co-developed. Privileged. Long-cycle.
Best for: A small number of organizations co-developing continuity infrastructure with us — operationally embedded, doctrinally close.
Cohort terms · by invitation and mutual fit
A starting range. Final scope is shaped jointly with you and your procurement leadership — no self-serve checkout, ever.
Most organizations start with a short continuity conversation, even when they think they need software right away.
This work usually happens in stages. Organizations start with a check, move into deeper review if needed, and only then decide whether broader rollout support makes sense.
A scoped organizational diagnostic that surfaces where continuity actually breaks — and where it quietly holds.
Adaptive continuity intelligence: continuity topology, modernization pathways, and confidence-aware interpretation.
Translate findings into a governance-readable map of dependencies, decisions of record, and continuity obligations.
Only here does the platform enter — as continuity infrastructure activated on top of the assessment, not as generic software.
Ongoing continuity stewardship: governance entropy review, executive intelligence, and federation-level continuity health.
Most organizations discover they have a knowledge and handoff problem before they have a software problem. We help measure that risk first.
Procedural knowledge concentrated in a few experienced people. One retirement, one rotation, and the organization loses years of judgment.
Every new officer, staff member, or steward inherits unfinished casework with no operating record or precedent map.
Decisions, motions, and commitments scattered across inboxes, drives, and meeting notes — defensible in the moment, undocumented across cycles.
Tooling decisions made without continuity assessment usually accelerate fragmentation rather than resolve it. The wrong platform makes things worse.
The federation depends on individuals more than the individuals know. When they leave, the dependency surfaces — usually under operational pressure.
There is no single trigger — but these are the operational moments that consistently bring federations and unions to the OCI conversation.
An incoming president, executive director, or general counsel needs continuity inherited — not reconstructed.
A federation is reviewing tooling and wants to understand continuity risk before procuring anything.
Locals, committees, and staff operating without a shared operating record — coordination cost rising every quarter.
New stewards and officers are arriving faster than the organization can transfer judgment to them.
A merger, reorganization, or constitutional review needs a continuity baseline before any structural decision.
Leadership has named succession and organizational memory as strategic risks and wants them measurable.
A national or sectoral body coordinating across many locals needs operational topology, not more meetings.
Every service option carries the same core commitments. These are usually the first things procurement teams want to review.
Every operational pathway assumes a named human owner. Cognition surfaces are operator-initiated and operator-reviewable.
Reasoning operates under organizational governance — not autonomous agent assumptions. Explainability is structural, not optional.
UnionEyes does not rank, score, or monitor individual workers. Continuity infrastructure is organizational, not personal.
Every interpretive surface exposes its confidence posture and dependency chain. No opaque decisions.
All cognition is oriented toward organizational continuity — not productivity scoring or behavioural analysis.
We do not benchmark, league-table, or compare unions against each other. Continuity is sovereign to each organization.
Canadian-hosted, sovereignty-conscious organizational trust. Data residency and sovereign hosting are structural commitments.
When systems degrade, they degrade safely — operations remain governable, not opaque.
Tell us where your organization is today. We will help you understand which option fits and what the next step should be.
Scope and pricing are finalized with executive and procurement leadership. There is no self-serve subscription path.